How It Works

The LSV process can be followed by anyone individually or in group study using nothing more than access to original texts and accurate linguistic tools. The framework works with or without software.

1. Formulate a Claim

Create a single, clear, absolute claim that can be tested. Avoid opinions, vague language, or layered logic.

2. Verify Word Definitions

Analyze the key terms in the original language (Hebrew, Greek, Arabic, etc.) using lexicons, concordances, or interlinear tools.

3. Source Validation

Test the claim against the actual wording of the original texts. Include relevant passages and context. Historical records can also be used when appropriate.

4. Identify Contradictions

Check for internal contradictions within the same source and cross-source contradictions (e.g., different religious texts). Surface them clearly and let the evidence speak.

5. Peer Review (Optional)

Share the claim with other knowledgeable individuals who also follow LSV to get validation or challenges. This step increases integrity but is not required.

6. Re-check Over Time

New manuscript discoveries, improved lexicons, or better historical clarity may require occasional re-validation of claims.

About LSV

LSV is often misunderstood. Here's what it does not do:

It offers an even playing field where every claim must show its source and withstand textual, historical, and logical scrutiny.

What LSV Is Not

❌ It is not a religion, belief system, or form of theology
❌ It does not harmonize contradictions
❌ It does not accept tradition, commentary, or creeds as valid sources
❌ It is not designed to “defend” any scripture or group
❌ It is not a symbolic or allegorical interpretive tool

What LSV is:

✅ A logic-first, source-only fact-verification framework
✅ Open to all belief systems that preserve original texts
✅ A way to find what is provably true across traditions

Who Uses LSV?

LSV is built for anyone who wants religious and historical truth not filtered belief.

Scholars

to fact-check across religious texts

Seekers

to evaluate what is verifiably true

Leaders

to refine teachings using literal evidence

Historians

to confirm what religious groups actually recorded

Skeptics

to test without entering a belief system

Whether you're exploring faith, truth, or contradiction, LSV gives you the tools to test any religious claim on equal terms.

How LSV Looks in Action

Literal Source Verification can only be understood in full when it's seen in use. Below are sample claims with LSV-approved evidence, original language validation, and outcomes.

✅ Example: “Jesus was crucified”
  • Sources: Tacitus (Annals 15.44), Josephus (Antiquities 18.3.3)
  • Evidence Type: First-century historical records
  • Validation: Supported by multiple independent sources
  • LSV Verdict: ✅ Valid historical fact

❌ Example: “Jesus was seen alive after crucifixion”
  • Sources: Josephus (reports follower belief), no neutral eyewitness sources
  • Evidence Type: Cultural reporting of belief, not historical fact
  • LSV Verdict: ❌ Not validated as fact; only valid as record of belief

⚠️ Example: “The Quran prohibits alcohol”
  • Sources: Quranic verses (early verses permit, later ones prohibit)
  • Evidence Type: Internal scriptural contradiction over time
  • LSV Verdict: ⚠️ Valid contradiction within a single source

These examples show how LSV separates verifiable truth from inherited belief using source-only logic.